'Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really' - Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Voluntary and community sector bereavement services are central to bereavement support in the UK. AIM: To determine service providers' perspectives on access to their support before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design: (1) Cross-sectional online survey of UK bereavement services; (2) Qualitative interviews with staff and volunteers at selected services. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: 147 services participated in the survey; 24 interviews were conducted across 14 services. RESULTS: 67.3% of services reported there were groups with unmet needs not accessing their services before the pandemic; most frequently people from minoritised ethnic communities (49%), sexual minority groups (26.5%), deprived areas (24.5%) and men (23.8%). Compared with before the pandemic, 3.4% of services were seeing more people from minoritised ethnic groups, while 6.1% were seeing fewer. 25.2% of services did not collect ethnicity data. Qualitative findings demonstrated the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on minoritised ethnic communities, including disruption to care/mourning practices, and the need for culturally appropriate support. During the pandemic outreach activities were sometimes deprioritised; however, increased collaboration was also reported. Online provision improved access but excluded some. Positive interventions to increase equity included collecting client demographic data; improving outreach, language accessibility and staff representation; supporting other professionals to provide bereavement support; local collaboration and co-production. CONCLUSIONS: Service providers report inequities in access to bereavement support. Attention needs to be paid to identifying, assessing and meeting unmet needs for appropriate bereavement support. Identified positive interventions can inform service provision and research.

Bereavement during COVID-19: findings from a UK-wide online survey on the use and perceived helpfulness of informal and formal support during the pandemic

IntroductionMillions became bereaved during the pandemic, with many facing challenges accessing support.AimsTo describe the use and helpfulness of different types of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK.MethodsA longitudinal survey of people bereaved during the pandemic over four time points. At 7- and 13-months post-bereavement (T2 and T3), participants rated the helpfulness of support used and described how they had been helped by this support.Results420 participants completed at least one follow-up survey (T2, T3 or both). Most respondents were female (88.3%) and had lost a parent (57.6%) or partner (24.3%), with 3.3% from a minoritised ethnic background. Support from family and friends, reported by 89.3% of participants, was rated as ‘quite helpful' (mean rating 4.3 out of 5), and included help with practical tasks, expressing feelings/sharing grief, remembering, feeling cared for and less isolated. The most commonly used form of other support was 1:1 support (e.g. counselling), used by 40.5% of participants, with an average helpfulness rating of 4.1, helping participants feel listened to and process their grief. Online community support, used by 31.0% of participants, was also rated ‘quite helpful' (3.9), enabling sharing with similar others, feeling understood and less alone. Informal and formal bereavement groups were rated as similarly helpful (4.2) while helplines and specialist mental health support were slightly less helpful (3.6) (used by 9.3%, 4.8%, 7.1% and 4.5% of participants, respectively).ConclusionsResults demonstrate the perceived benefits and helpfulness of different forms of bereavement support used during the pandemic.ImpactThese findings highlight the value of informal as well as formal support, particularly bereavement counselling. Policy makers must attend to the foundational and second tiers of the public health model of bereavement support, supporting communities as well as services.

Grieving during COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of people bereaved during the first two waves of the pandemic

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on all aspects of life. The high number of deaths and bereavements increased demand on already stretched services, whilst the unique circumstances caused by enforced social distancing meant that people bereaved at this time faced many additional challenges and potentially problematic grief trajectories.AimsTo explore in depth people's lived experiences of bereavement during the Covid-19 pandemic, their adaptation and coping during this time, and the effect of informal and formal sources of bereavement support .MethodsSemi-structured longitudinal telephone interviews were conducted with people bereaved during the first 10 months of the pandemic (March to December 2020), purposively sampled from a cohort of survey participants. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically.Results24 participants (19 female;5 men) took part in a first interview and 15 in a follow up interview, approximately four months later. Five major themes were identified: End of life experiences;Funerals and memorialisation;Grieving and psychological impacts;Coping and adaptation and Sources of support. Many challenges relating to the pandemic context were identified, including restrictions to end of life and memorialisation arrangements, dealing with personal affairs, and lack of support. Such experiences negatively impacted individual grieving and wellbeing, in particular feelings of isolation and guilt surrounding lack of contact with the deceased. Participants experienced difficulties accessing services, and sometimes received support that was not appropriate for their particular situations and needs. Despite these difficulties, some people demonstrated remarkable resilience, and ability to cope and find meaning.ConclusionsPeople bereaved in the COVID-19 pandemic have navigated grief and bereavement through exceptionally challenging circumstances, often lacking the informal and formal support needed to help them cope.ImpactThese insights can be used to help improve the care and support provided to bereaved people throughout their bereavement journeys.

Factors Associated With Higher Levels of Grief and Support Needs Among People Bereaved During the Pandemic: Results from a National Online Survey.

We identified factors associated with higher levels of grief and support needs among 711 people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK (deaths 16 March 2020-2 January 2021). An online survey assessed grief using the Adult Attitude to Grief (AAG) scale, which calculates an overall index of vulnerability (IOV) (range 0-36), and practical and emotional support needs in 13 domains. Participants' mean age was 49.5 (SD 12.9); 628 (88.6%) female. Mean age of deceased 72.2 (SD 16.1). 311 (43.8%) deaths were from confirmed/suspected COVID-19. High overall levels of grief and support needs were observed; 28.2% exhibited severe vulnerability (index of vulnerability ≥24). Grief and support needs were higher for close relationships with the deceased (vs. more distant) and reported social isolation and loneliness (p < 0.001), and lower when age of deceased was above 40-50. Other associated factors were place of death and health professional support post-death (p < 0.05).

'It was brutal. It still is': a qualitative analysis of the challenges of bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic reported in two national surveys.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been a devastating, mass bereavement event characterised by high levels of disruption to end-of-life, grieving and coping processes. Quantitative evidence is emerging on the effects of the pandemic on grief outcomes, but rich qualitative evidence on the lived experiences of people bereaved during these times is lacking. Methods: We analysed qualitative data from two independent UK-wide online surveys to describe the experiences of 881 people bereaved during the pandemic. We analysed the data in two phases, conducting an inductive thematic analysis and then applying Stroebe and Schut's Dual Process Model (DPM) and concepts of loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping (1999; 2010) as an analytic lens to further contextualise and interpret the data. Results: We identified six main themes: troubled deaths; mourning, memorialisation and death administration; mass bereavement, the media and the ongoing threat of the pandemic; grieving and coping; work and employment; and support from the health and social care system. Examples of loss-oriented stressors included being unable to visit and say goodbye at the end of life and restricted funeral and memorialisation practices. Associated reactions were feelings of guilt, anger, and problems accepting the death and beginning to grieve. Examples of restoration-oriented stressors and reactions were severely curtailed support-systems and social/recreational activities, which impacted people's ability to cope. Conclusion: Study results demonstrate the exceptionally difficult sets of experiences associated with pandemic bereavement, and the utility of the DPM for conceptualising these additional challenges and their impacts on grieving. Our analysis builds and expands on previous use of the DPM in explicating the impact of the pandemic on bereavement. We make recommendations for statutory, private and third sector organisations for improving the experiences of people bereaved during and following this and future pandemics.

Parental perspectives on the grief and support needs of children and young people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative findings from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many children and young people have experienced the death of close family members, whilst also facing unprecedented disruption to their lives. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and support needs of bereaved children and young people from the perspective of their parents and guardians. METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional qualitative free-text data from a survey of adults bereaved in the UK during the pandemic. Participants were recruited via media, social media, national associations and community/charitable organisations. Thematic analysis was conducted on free text data collected from parent/guardian participants in response to a survey question on the bereavement experiences and support needs of their children. RESULTS: Free-text data from 104 parent/guardian participants was included. Three main themes were identified: the pandemic-related challenges and struggles experienced by children and young people; family support and coping; and support from schools and services. Pandemic-challenges include the impacts of being separated from the relative prior to their death, isolation from peers and other family members, and disruption to daily routines and wider support networks. Examples were given of effective family coping and communication, but also of difficulties relating to parental grief and children's existing mental health problems. Schools and bereavement organisations' provision of specialist support was valued, but there was evidence of unmet need, with some participants reporting a lack of access to specialist grief or mental health support. CONCLUSION: Children and young people have faced additional strains and challenges associated with pandemic bereavement. We recommend resources and initiatives that facilitate supportive communication within family and school settings, adequate resourcing of school and community-based specialist bereavement/mental health services, and increased information and signposting to the support that is available.

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on bereavement support services in the UK: findings from a cross-sectional online survey and qualitative case studies

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic has caused c.131,000 excess deaths in the UK to date. During the pandemic, voluntary and community sector (VCS) bereavement services have played a central role in supporting the bereaved. We describe the impact on and response of these services to inform service development and policy.MethodsMixed-methods explanatory sequential design in two phases: (1) Online survey (March-May 2021) of VCS bereavement services in the UK, disseminated via national organisations, networks and social media;(2) Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with staff/volunteers at case study VCS bereavement services (June-December 2021). Interviews explored challenges/innovation in bereavement support during the pandemic, with transcripts analysed using thematic analysis.Results147 organisations participated in the survey;53% were regional, 16% UK-wide. 36% were hospice/palliative care services, 15% national bereavement charities/Non-Governmental Organisations;12% local bereavement charities. During this period of the pandemic referrals increased for 46% of organisations and decreased for 35%. 78.2% changed services and 51.7% introduced new services (such as online/telephone support). 24 people across 14 organisations were interviewed. Challenges encountered included: rapidly setting up online/telephone provision and consequent changes to the therapeutic encounter;developing new policies/procedures;coping with fluctuating demand and clients’ complex grief responses;supporting staff/volunteers working from home;and a loss of funding. Nevertheless, innovation and positive impacts were reported including: modernisation of services;expanding access for some groups (younger people, men, rural communities);increased cohesion amongst staff;and instigation of local collaborations.ConclusionsUK bereavement services rapidly transformed during the pandemic, despite significant challenges. Important lessons have been learned and providers generally advocate a blended approach for future provision of bereavement support. To ensure positive changes are retained, the experiences and acceptability of new/adapted services among clients and staff require further investigation, while services’ ability to meet demand requires sustained or additional resources.

Coproducing a library of videos to support families caring for children with gastrostomies: A mixed-methods evaluation with family carers and clinicians.

INTRODUCTION: Many families now perform specialist medical procedures at home. Families need appropriate training and support to do this. The aim of this study was to evaluate a library of videos, coproduced with parents and healthcare professionals, to support and educate families caring for a child with a gastrostomy. METHODS: A mixed-methods online survey evaluating the videos was completed by 43 family carers who care for children with gastrostomies and 33 healthcare professionals (community-based nurses [n = 16], paediatricians [n = 6], dieticians [n = 6], hospital-based nurses [n = 4], paediatric surgeon [n = 1]) from the United Kingdom. Participants watched a sample of videos, rated statements on the videos and reflected on how the videos could be best used in practice. RESULTS: Both family carers and healthcare professionals perceived the video library as a valuable resource for parents and strongly supported the use of videos in practice. All healthcare professionals and 98% (n = 42) of family carers agreed they would recommend the videos to other families. Family carers found the videos empowering and easy to follow and valued the mixture of healthcare professionals and families featured in the videos. Participants gave clear recommendations for how different video topics should fit within the existing patient pathway. DISCUSSION: Families and healthcare professionals perceived the videos to be an extremely useful resource for parents, supporting them practically and emotionally. Similar coproduced educational materials are needed to support families who perform other medical procedures at home. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two parent representatives attended the research meetings from conception of the project and were involved in the design, conduct and dissemination of the surveys. The videos themselves were coproduced with several different families.

Cohort profile: The UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) prospective longitudinal mixed-methods study of health and well-being during the SARSCoV2 coronavirus pandemic.

Public perceptions of pandemic viral threats and government policies can influence adherence to containment, delay, and mitigation policies such as physical distancing, hygienic practices, use of physical barriers, uptake of testing, contact tracing, and vaccination programs. The UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) study aims to identify determinants of health behaviour using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) model using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach. Here, we provide a detailed description of the demographic and self-reported health characteristics of the COPE cohort at baseline assessment, an overview of data collected, and plans for follow-up of the cohort. The COPE baseline survey was completed by 11,113 UK adult residents (18+ years of age). Baseline data collection started on the 13th of March 2020 (10-days before the introduction of the first national COVID-19 lockdown in the UK) and finished on the 13th of April 2020. Participants were recruited via the HealthWise Wales (HWW) research registry and through social media snowballing and advertising (Facebook®, Twitter®, Instagram®). Participants were predominantly female (69%), over 50 years of age (68%), identified as white (98%), and were living with their partner (68%). A large proportion (67%) had a college/university level education, and half reported a pre-existing health condition (50%). Initial follow-up plans for the cohort included in-depth surveys at 3-months and 12-months after the first UK national lockdown to assess short and medium-term effects of the pandemic on health behaviour and subjective health and well-being. Additional consent will be sought from participants at follow-up for data linkage and surveys at 18 and 24-months after the initial UK national lockdown. A large non-random sample was recruited to the COPE cohort during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, which will enable longitudinal analysis of the determinants of health behaviour and changes in subjective health and well-being over the course of the pandemic.

What a difference a systematic review makes

IntroductionSystematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarise all the evidence meeting pre-specified eligibility criteria for a given clinical question. However, they face criticisms including long completion timeframes and level of impact. Whilst systematic reviews represent a robust methodology, evidence synthesis must address the challenges of timeliness and impacting at pace on care delivery.AimsWe use the example of a rapidly conducted narrative systematic review on the challenge of supporting large numbers of bereaved people to demonstrate how evidence can be gathered at pace and impact quickly on palliative care practice and policy.MethodWe followed Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS) methodology1 with narrative synthesis, developed to conduct rapid reviews requested by clinicians/clinical services. A systematic search was conducted on four databases and supplementary search methods were employed to identify additional papers.ResultsSix studies were included, reporting on system responses to man-made disasters and natural disasters. Through narrative synthesis we sought to draw consistent lessons from the available evidence. The review was completed in 10 weeks and rapidly published in a peer reviewed journal2 adding to the emergent Covid literature, informing a subsequent UK wide study and provided evidence in support of a national bereavement framework for Wales.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented research worldwide. Our review highlighted common features for effective service delivery that can be identified for bereavement support beyond the pandemic, which will have a long-lasting impact.ImpactInformed the successful funding application and project design for: Supporting people bereaved during COVID–19: a mixed methods study of bereaved people’s experiences and the bereavement services supporting them.Informed steering group discussions for the new National Framework for Bereavement Care in WalesReview published July 2020, up to now 16 citations.Placed at the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric.References Mann M, Woodward A, Nelson A, Byrne A. Palliative care evidence review service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership. Health Research Policy and Systems 2019;17(1):100. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0504-4 Harrop E, Mann M, Semedo L, Chao D, Selman LE, Byrne A. What elements of a systems’ approach to bereavement are most effective in times of mass bereavement? A narrative systematic review with lessons for COVID-19. Palliative Medicine, 2020;34(9):1165–1181. doi:10.1177/0269216320946273

‘There is nowhere to place the anger’: accounts of bereavement experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionThe Covid-19 pandemic has been a mass bereavement event, causing major disruption to end-of-life, grieving and coping processes. Based on their Dual Process Model (DPM), Stroebe and Schut have identified pandemic-specific risk factors for poor bereavement outcomes and categorised these in terms of disruptions to loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping processes which grieving people naturally oscillate between. Loss-oriented coping involves focussing on one’s loved one and their death, while restoration-oriented coping involves continuing with daily life and distracting oneself from one’s grief.AimsTo explore and describe bereavement experiences during the pandemic, relating our findings to the constructs of the DPM.MethodTwo independent online surveys were disseminated UK-wide via social media platforms and community and charitable organisations. They captured end-of-life and bereavement experiences (to all causes of death) from March 2020 to January 2021. Free-text data were analysed thematically, using the DPM as an analytic lens.ResultsSix main themes were identified: troubled and traumatic deaths;disrupted mourning, memorialisation and difficulties in death-related administration;mass bereavement, media and societal responses and the ongoing threat of the virus;grieving and coping (alone and with others);workplace and employment difficulties;and accessing health and social care support. Examples of loss-oriented stressors were being unable to visit or say goodbye and restricted funeral and memorialisation practices, leading to guilt and anger. Restoration-oriented stressors included severely restricted social networks and support systems, which affected peoples’ ability to cope.ConclusionThese results highlight significant disruptions to end-of-life, death and mourning practices, as well as usual coping mechanisms and support systems, during the Covid-19 pandemic. The DPM provides a useful framework for conceptualizing the additional challenges associated with pandemic bereavement and their impact on grieving and mental health.ImpactRecommendations are made for statutory, private and third sector organisations for improving experiences of people bereaved during this and future pandemics.

Parents’ accounts of the grief experiences and support needs of children and young people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a UK-wide online survey

IntroductionMany children and young people have experienced the death of close family members during the Covid-19 pandemic, whilst also facing unprecedented disruption to their daily routines and support networks.AimsThis study investigated their bereavement experiences and support needs as described by their parents/guardians.MethodWe disseminated a UK-wide online survey through social media platforms and community/charitable organisations, capturing the grief experiences of adults bereaved during the pandemic. Parent/guardian free-text responses (N=106) to a question on their child(ren)’s support needs were analysed thematically.ResultsThree main themes were identified: the pandemic-related challenges and struggles experienced by children and young people;family support and coping;and support from schools and services. Pandemic specific challenges include the impacts of not being able to be with the relative prior to their death, isolation from peers and other family members, and disruption to daily routines and wider support networks. Examples were given of effective coping and grief-related communication within families, but some parents also described difficulties relating to their own grief and children’s pre-existing mental health problems. The important role of schools and bereavement organisations in providing specialist support was valued, but there was evidence of unmet need and difficulties accessing bereavement and mental health support.ConclusionChildren and young people have faced additional strains and challenges associated with pandemic bereavement, with some requiring specialist bereavement or mental health support.ImpactThis study provides insight into how children and young people experienced the death of a close family member during the pandemic. We recommend initiatives that facilitate open communication within family, peer and school settings, adequate resourcing of school and community-based specialist services, and increased information and signposting to support.

Support needs and barriers to accessing support: Baseline results of a mixed-methods national survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is a mass bereavement event which has profoundly disrupted grief experiences. Understanding support needs and access to support among people bereaved at this time is crucial to ensuring appropriate bereavement support infrastructure. AIM: To investigate grief experiences, support needs and use of formal and informal bereavement support among people bereaved during the pandemic. DESIGN: Baseline results from a longitudinal survey. Support needs and experiences of accessing support are reported using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of free-text data. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 711 adults bereaved in the UK between March and December 2020, recruited via media, social media, national associations and community/charitable organisations. RESULTS: High-level needs for emotional support were identified. Most participants had not sought support from bereavement services (59%, n = 422) or their General-Practitioner (60%, n = 428). Of participants who had sought such support, over half experienced difficulties accessing bereavement services (56%, n = 149)/General-Practitioner support (52%, n = 135). About 51% reported high/severe vulnerability in grief; among these, 74% were not accessing bereavement or mental-health services. Barriers included limited availability, lack of appropriate support, discomfort asking for help and not knowing how to access services. About 39% (n = 279) experienced difficulties getting support from family/friends, including relational challenges, little face-to-face contact and disrupted collective mourning. The perceived uniqueness of pandemic bereavement and wider societal strains exacerbated their isolation. CONCLUSIONS: People bereaved during the pandemic have high levels of support needs alongside difficulties accessing support. We recommend increased provision and tailoring of bereavement services, improved information on support options and social/educational initiatives to bolster informal support and ameliorate isolation.

Healthcare professionals’ experiences of the barriers and facilitators to community paediatric pain management at end-of-life

BackgroundInadequate pain management in community paediatric palliative care is common. Evidence to inform improved pain management in this population is limited.ObjectivesTo explore the barriers and facilitators to paediatric community-based pain management for infants, children and young people at end-of-life as perceived by healthcare professionals.MethodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 29 healthcare professionals;12 nurses, five GPs, five consultants and registrar doctors, two pharmacists and five support therapists working in primary, secondary or tertiary care in the UK and involved in community end-of-life care of 0–18-year-olds. The data corpus was analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.ResultsSeven themes emerged from the data: parents’ abilities, beliefs and wellbeing;working relationships between families and healthcare professionals, and between healthcare teams;healthcare professionals’ knowledge, education and experience;health services delivery;nature of pain treatment;and paediatric-specific factors. Across themes, the concepts of partnership working between families and healthcare professionals, and within healthcare teams, and sharing expertise were prevalent.ConclusionsIt is important that healthcare professionals and parents work together, and that mutual trust is built up through two-way conversations. Community healthcare professionals would benefit from education from experienced multidisciplinary teams to effectively manage paediatric pain at end-of-life and prevent emergency hospice or hospital admissions, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6 End of life and bereavement experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: Interim results from a national survey of bereaved people

BackgroundCOVID-19 represents a mass bereavement event, with 80,000+ excess UK deaths. The unprecedented clinical and social restrictions are potential risk factors for poor bereavement outcomes. This study investigates the bereavement experiences, support needs and support use of people bereaved during the pandemic.MethodsInterim findings from the first round of a mixed methods longitudinal survey of people bereaved in the UK since 16March 2020. The survey was disseminated via media, social media, national associations and community/charitable organisations. Grief was assessed using the Adult Attitude to Grief Scale.Results532 bereaved people participated (91% female). Place of death: hospital (55%), home (22%), care home (15%), hospice (5%);46% of deaths were confirmed/suspected COVID-19. Experiences of end of life care varied: 23% were ‘never’ involved in decisions about their loved one’s care, 36% felt ‘not at all’ supported by healthcare professionals after the death, 51% were not provided with information about bereavement support. Respondents reported high levels of problems specific to the pandemic bereavement context (e.g. 56% unable to visit prior to death, 67% social isolation and loneliness). Over half of participants demonstrated ‘severe’ (28%) or ‘high’ (24%) levels of vulnerability in grief, and support needs were high/fairly high in six psycho-emotional domains (51% to 62%). COVID-19 deaths were associated with higher levels of bereavement problems (p<0.05), grief vulnerability (p<0.05) and support needs (P< 0.001) compared to other causes of death. 21% of those with ‘severe’ vulnerability were accessing individual counselling, compared with 23% overall. Barriers to accessing professional support included long waiting lists, lack of appropriate support, feeling uncomfortable asking for/not knowing how to access help. 41% reported difficulties getting support from family/friends.ConclusionsPeople bereaved during the pandemic experience exceptionally difficult circumstances at the end of life and during bereavement, including unmet needs for social and professional support. We recommend improved communication with families at the end of life, enabling contact with patients as far as possible, and better support after a death. This includes increased information about and investment in bereavement support services as well as flexible ‘support bubble’ arrangements for the recently bereaved.

Transmucosal drug administration as an alternative route in palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a surge in need for alternative routes of administration of drugs for end of life and palliative care, particularly in community settings. Transmucosal routes include intranasal, buccal, sublingual and rectal. They are non-invasive routes for systemic drug delivery with the possibility of self-administration, or administration by family caregivers. In addition, their ability to offer rapid onset of action with reduced first-pass metabolism make them suitable for use in palliative and end-of-life care to provide fast relief of symptoms. This is particularly important in COVID-19, as patients can deteriorate rapidly. Despite the advantages, these routes of administration face challenges including a relatively small surface area for effective drug absorption, small volume of fluid for drug dissolution and the presence of a mucus barrier, thereby limiting the number of drugs that are suitable to be delivered through the transmucosal route. In this review, the merits, challenges and limitations of each of these transmucosal routes are discussed. The goals are to provide insights into using transmucosal drug delivery to bring about the best possible symptom management for patients at the end of life, and to inspire scientists to develop new delivery systems to provide effective symptom management for this group of patients.

Orodispersible and transmucosal alternative medications for symptom control in adults.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric palliative care makes frequent use of orodispersible and transmucosal drug delivery routes. The limited published experience of this practice suggests that it enables the delivery of needle-free symptom relief, with the potential to train family carers to administer anticipatory medications without reliance on trained health professionals. AIMS: To identify orodispersible and potential transmucosal alternatives that may be used in adults in the event of a patient having no oral or intravenous route and no access to subcutaneous injections. METHODS: The author panel identified medications through review of multiple drug formularies, review of the published evidence and their experience. Where possible, licensed alternatives were identified and any 'off label' or unlicensed medications clearly highlighted. RESULTS: A list of 27 medications is provided, which could be used either via the orodispersible or transmucosal alternative route for healthcare professionals delivering end of life care to consider when the licensed alternative routes are unavailable. All users of this guide are encouraged to use their professional judgement whenever selecting a medication for a patient, recognising that this review is neither a guideline nor a systematic review, and taking account of licensing considerations, adverse effects, potential unpredictability of time to effect and contraindications. CONCLUSION: Should it be necessary to use these orodispersible or transmucosal alternatives then any experience gained should be reported in the literature. Combined with further research, this experience offers the possibility of reducing injection frequency and inherent delays in medication administration, particularly in the community setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

What elements of a systems' approach to bereavement are most effective in times of mass bereavement? A narrative systematic review with lessons for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The global COVID-19 pandemic has left health and social care systems facing the challenge of supporting large numbers of bereaved people in difficult and unprecedented social conditions. Previous reviews have not comprehensively synthesised the evidence on the response of health and social care systems to mass bereavement events. AIM: To synthesise the evidence regarding system-level responses to mass bereavement events, including natural and human-made disasters as well as pandemics, to inform service provision and policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. DESIGN: A rapid systematic review was conducted, with narrative synthesis. The review protocol was registered prospectively (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, CRD 42020180723). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2020. Reference lists were screened for further relevant publications, and citation tracking was performed. RESULTS: Six studies were included reporting on system responses to mass bereavement following human-made and natural disasters, involving a range of individual and group-based support initiatives. Positive impacts were reported, but study quality was generally low and reliant on data from retrospective evaluation designs. Key features of service delivery were identified: a proactive outreach approach, centrally organised but locally delivered interventions, event-specific professional competencies and an emphasis on psycho-educational content. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations in the quantity and quality of the evidence base, consistent messages are identified for bereavement support provision during the pandemic. High quality primary studies are needed to ensure service improvement in the current crisis and to guide future disaster response efforts.